« Home | The Grassroots Organization 101 The Invisible Pill... » | The “Super Seven” Junior Ministers In 2001 Genera... » | Coming Soon! "Three of the Super Seven Junior Mini... » | General Elections - Part II MACPHERSON SMC (22,01... » | General Elections – Who is Going Where? Part I My... » | DPM TAN SETS TO RETIRE IN AUGUST 2005 Maybe this ... » | The True Story of Dr Balaji’s Fight against HIV Hi... » | Presidential Elections & General Elections When, H... » | casiNO, CASINO, caSINo? A story which the governme... » | Singapore Politics Politics, a DND strand that is... » 

Friday, July 29, 2005 

Truth of Evening ERP Charges
Facts from Fiction & the Mismanagement of LTA

SINGAPORE: From August 1, motorists heading north on the Central Expressway between 6pm and 8pm must pay evening Electronic Road Pricing charges.

Transport Minister Yeo Cheow Tong said if the new ERP charges could ease congestion on the CTE, Singapore would not need the proposed North-South Expressway.

There are presently eight expressways serving Singapore motorists, and the ninth - the Kallang Paya Lebar Expressway - would be ready in 2008.

And more expressways will be built, depending on the population growth. Mr Yeo said the Government was still assessing whether there was a need to build a North-South expressway.

This is because the project is not only expensive, but also complicated as it will cut through several nature reserves.

"The North-South Expressway - we have got no timeline for that yet. Maybe it will be built in the next 10 years, maybe not. Depends very much on the demand, and the cost of the system.

"The KPE costs us quite a few billion dollars. I think the North-South Expressway have to run through all these sensitive areas, will cost us even more."

Mr Yeo said both Singapore's road and rail network had surpassed their original targets as set out in the Land Transport Authority's World-Class Transport System White Paper.

Between 1996 and 2000, 225 kilometres of lane-miles were planned. But double that distance has been built and at a lower cost than the $1.1 billion original estimates.

Mr Yeo said: "Singapore is actually quite densely built up, in terms of road. Today the road space is 12 per cent of our total land area. Our residential usage only takes up 13 per cent. So actually road space takes up as much space as our homes. So there is a limit to how much more we can grow."

But he said in time, Singapore's public transport system would be as extensive as those in London and Paris.

The MRT Circle Line is expected to be running by 2010. Two new MRT lines would also link Marine Parade with Bukit Timah.


Mr Yeo said: "I think give us another 20 to 25 years, I think the density of train stations in the city centre would be as good as London, because by that time I would expect that we would have two additional new lines built."

And when the railway network is complete, Singaporeans will be able to take an MRT train from the City to any corner of the island. - CNA/de


Let me get straight to the point. The new ERP will NOT solve the jam at the CTE nor does it intends to. For any logical road user, would a $1.00 charge prevent the driver or alter his/her decision to use the CTE to get home? NOPE! Currently, there are only few alternative routes that the driver can use to avoid CTE, which is Lornie Road or Thomson Road. So if the new ERP do work, it will only push traffic towards those areas. What next? Putting more ERP on those areas?

LTA are not so stupid as to believe that $1.00 charge in the CTE will alter the drivers’ decision to use the CTE. Nor do I think that the charge will stop at $1.00. Judging by past LTA practices, if after a couple months, the jam doesn’t seem to ease (which will definitely not ease) they will have more excuses to increase the charge to maybe $2.00. Obvious they can’t immediately increase the charge to $2.00 or there will be a public backlash. So it will be just an incremental increase over time. But will it solve the jams? Never! LTA might as well put a $100 charge for using CTE so that only Ministers and CEOs can use the roads.

Implementing such road pricing is not going solve jams, but just gaining revenue out of jams. For every car that passes through the ERP gantries, $1.00 goes of the driver’s cash cards. Every evening, one of the 5 ERP gantries on the CTE will see around 10,000 cars through the CTE (there are 244,000 cars traffic volume using the expressways to the CBD area each day) every evening. $1.00 for every car will see their daily additional intakes of $10,000 per evening. Multiply that by a year, you get a cool additional intake of $3.6 million just “trying” to solve the jam in CTE.

Let me bring you back to 10 November 2003 in the parliamentary seating where LTA was again in the spotlight. MP Wong Kai Yuen said,

“Sir, EZ Link could do so (charging the commuters $5 for every EZ-link card purchase) because its parent, the LTA, is both the regulator and the owner of the fare collection system. This, I believe, is fundamentally wrong. It is wrong in terms of principle. It is wrong because there exists a conflict of interests between the regulator and the operator. Getting the commuter to pay for the cards is a solution to a problem that could only be arrived at by decision makers with a civil service mindset. The fact that we see such befuddled thinking from the LTA should no longer surprise us in this House. In fact, it is the same agency that causes none other than Deputy Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong to publicly acknowledge its two very big mistakes. Firstly, Deputy PM Lee Hsien Loong described the scheme to charge the taxi drivers a fee in order to monitor their performance "invidious" in the House recently. So he actually changed it. On the North East Line, Minister Yeo Cheow Tong did - which he denied - a policy U-turn. And Deputy PM Lee described it in public that it was a mistake made by the Government to require more than one rail operator under the premise of increasing competition. Are these just "honest mistakes", as we have a tendency to classify such mistakes made by civil servants? Or is it symptomatic of something deeper?”

“Which brings me actually back to the fundamental question: why would LTA set up EZ Link Pte Ltd to be a 100% owned company in the first place? Having done so, why does it sign over the right to manage the float to a bank? Why did it not adopt the same model as the TransitLink company that the ez link system be replaced? The TransitLink company is a jointly owned company by the transport operators. In fact, in that system, more than 8.7 million farecards were issued, and the company did not complain that too many cards were issued. There are several reasons for that. Firstly, the cards were cheap. I believe they were 20 cents each. Secondly, TransitLink held the float. More importantly, Sir, there were sufficient savings from the other operations of the TransitLink system to subsidise the cost of the cards.”

“So, indeed, Sir, why did LTA not replicate the same model? I can only surmise the reasons by looking at the moves EZ Link has made as a company. EZ Link card is designed to be used beyond transportation to pay for retail purchases. EZ Link, as a company, has entered into an exclusive agreement with QB Pte Ltd to extend the use of ez link cards for this very purpose. To enter into the realm of multiple electronic applications, MAS stipulated that EZ Link be tied up with a bank. QB Pte Ltd is a subsidiary of Green Dot Payment Services Pte Ltd which is, in turn, owned by Green Dot Capital Pte Ltd which is, in turn, owned by Singapore Technologies. As we all know, Singapore Technologies is a Government-linked company. So the Government has its hands in all this, somehow or other.”


I think Wong Kai Yuen brought up a every vital point about the management (or mismanagement of the LTA) and the misguided principle of being a transport regulator. As a public regulator, LTA setup a company to sell cards at a premium of $5 fixed charge when they found that accounts could be in red if they do not or could get more profits out of it? There are to serve the public to their best of their abilities in terms of lowing transport cost, not profiting and setting up their own subsidiaries to gain profits. I am sure, for public commuters, you could see other transport policies such as the raise in public transport fees were also in line with their current attitudes towards “solving” problems

The new ERP charges will be effective from 1 August 2005 but guess when did LTA when to the grassroots and citizens up in the north for their opinions? They only “seek” public feedback last week and this week. But from my sources, all the grassroots gave LTA officers a horrid time when they presented their reasons for the ERP charges. In fact, many grassroots fired and roasted them for their insincerity in getting feedbacks only after they decided to implement the charges.

In short, LTA knows that this new ERP charges will not solve the problems and the reason they still implement it is for all of us to imagine. Read Minister Yeo’s comments carefully and think if he sincerely believing that this could solve the problem.

yeah totally agree with u that the ERP on CTE is just a revenue raising method. This view also held by many people who bothered to give feedback thru the govt consultation portal.

come to think of it LTA is probably the ministry with the most problems such as NEL (just realise buangkok station still wasn't open yet...) and Nicol Highway. Not to mention the recent unpopulart, and more importantly unneccessary, new ERP charges and increase in public transport fares... tsk tsk...

Well.... I do agree ...
Singapore has grow fast and well...
And I do applauded the government for such a effort ...
But unfortunately, I personal feel that the time has its toll...

Government is facing a new mindset ... a mindset of making money out of public ...
For every dollar that they give, they will want to get few times as much in future ... much more than any interest charged... I wonder if they have taken thing for granted ....
Now their tactics are simply .... do it first and see how ... if anyone not happy, raise issue with us and we go one by one case ... but guess how many ppl really do that ... even if do that ... gov will still continue that plan no matter what .... so after so many plan proceed with such tactics , the gov will continue to do this way without really sincerely consulting the public anymore... Because most probably , pp will just accept it (BE FLEXIBLE AND ADAPTABLE) and wait for the next gov's SCHEME

The gov seek to convey this message ... => Welcome to the real world , this is how Singapore is going to run now and in future ...Accept this and move on ... Be flexible and adaptable ... Be willing to work in Macdonald and Burger King if needed do .... Do what is right for you and for us ....

But is what the government is telling us this ...and then take it for granted of typical singaporean....

It really grief to see that the Gov is becoming more realistic and yet the ppl is becoming soft-hearted and accept it ....... If the ppl behave this way, ppl will not take risk and become more entrepreneur-liked since the they accept their fate by been flexible and adaptable to whatever they do ....

Just my own opinion ... just voice my opinion...
I believe Singapore gov is the best in world in managing situation but they should not treat educated ppl as moron ... Sincereness and frankness is better ....
Look at newspaper ,,, when some gov figure told you that it better to pay this amount to use this causeway, then to make a big loop and ask u to do the math ....... Papa , please do this math, I will have save more if u did not implement the plan....

The gov seek to make money at every situation .... get more money by release more cars , get more COE , road tax but get more money out of ERP schemes .... Two ways to make $$$ ........

But does that $$$ ever make accountable to the public and how $$$ is spent accountable to public ..???
Perhaps the same thing say to NKF to be transparent by the gov should apply to themselves... cos we need to know if you really care about the public or have accept the status quo....

We pay the price for been the safest country in the world and that just the Singapore is officially 40years old that such thing happen.... I wonder what happen to the future .... if gov continue to do this , ppl one day might get delusion by them... and the gov might just pay a heavy price in order to regain trust of the general public .....

No matter, what they do ... frankness and sincere is always something that we like to see not pretension ...

thank ....

Well.... I do agree ...
Singapore has grow fast and well...
And I do applauded the government for such a effort ...
But unfortunately, I personal feel that the time has its toll...

Government is facing a new mindset ... a mindset of making money out of public ...
For every dollar that they give, they will want to get few times as much in future ... much more than any interest charged... I wonder if they have taken thing for granted ....
Now their tactics are simply .... do it first and see how ... if anyone not happy, raise issue with us and we go one by one case ... but guess how many ppl really do that ... even if do that ... gov will still continue that plan no matter what .... so after so many plan proceed with such tactics , the gov will continue to do this way without really sincerely consulting the public anymore... Because most probably , pp will just accept it (BE FLEXIBLE AND ADAPTABLE) and wait for the next gov's SCHEME

The gov seek to convey this message ... => Welcome to the real world , this is how Singapore is going to run now and in future ...Accept this and move on ... Be flexible and adaptable ... Be willing to work in Macdonald and Burger King if needed do .... Do what is right for you and for us ....

But is what the government is telling us this ...and then take it for granted of typical singaporean....

It really grief to see that the Gov is becoming more realistic and yet the ppl is becoming soft-hearted and accept it ....... If the ppl behave this way, ppl will not take risk and become more entrepreneur-liked since the they accept their fate by been flexible and adaptable to whatever they do ....

Just my own opinion ... just voice my opinion...
I believe Singapore gov is the best in world in managing situation but they should not treat educated ppl as moron ... Sincereness and frankness is better ....
Look at newspaper ,,, when some gov figure told you that it better to pay this amount to use this causeway, then to make a big loop and ask u to do the math ....... Papa , please do this math, I will have save more if u did not implement the plan....

The gov seek to make money at every situation .... get more money by release more cars , get more COE , road tax but get more money out of ERP schemes .... Two ways to make $$$ ........

But does that $$$ ever make accountable to the public and how $$$ is spent accountable to public ..???
Perhaps the same thing say to NKF to be transparent by the gov should apply to themselves... cos we need to know if you really care about the public or have accept the status quo....

We pay the price for been the safest country in the world and that just the Singapore is officially 40years old that such thing happen.... I wonder what happen to the future .... if gov continue to do this , ppl one day might get delusion by them... and the gov might just pay a heavy price in order to regain trust of the general public .....

No matter, what they do ... frankness and sincere is always something that we like to see not pretension ...

thank ....

Hi Anonymous and Andy

Thank you for your comments. I'm optimistic about the next generation of Ministers (eg, Vivian, Dr Ng, Dr Balaji, Tharman...) that they have got the right objective for politics. They have set up a transparent ministry whenever they are in it and I think it will be good for us and Singapore in the future.

Many have chose to link NKF with the PAP but I would rather not reach to that conclusion. In fact unknown to many, the parliamentary procedures and safeguards that are in place in Singapore have exceed many democratic countries. And not often do you see Ministries of other countries having annual reports, but in Singapore, we are one of the very few who have them.

Nonetheless, I do share your concern and it will be up to the true blooded Singaporeans to uphold and continue our present living conditions and wealth of the nation.

Happy National Day to all!

Cheers

Annual reports without accountability is useless imho.

Help me Dude, I think I'm lost..... I was searching for Elvis and somehow ended up in your blog, but you know I'm sure I saw him in a car lot yesterday, which is really strange because the last time I saw him was in the supermarket. No honest really, he was right there in front of me, next to the steaks singing "Love me Tender". He said to me (his lip was only slightly curled) "Boy, you need to get yourself a San Diego cosmetic surgery doctor ,to fit into those blue suede shoes of yours. But Elvis said in the Ghetto nobody can afford a San Diego plastic surgery doctor. Dude I'm All Shook Up said Elvis. I think I'll have me another cheeseburger. Then I'm gonna go round and see Michael Jackson and we're gonna watch a waaaay cool make-over show featuring some Tijuana dentists on the TV in the back of my Hummer. And then he just walked out of the supermarket singing. . . "You give me love and consolation,
You give me strength to carry on " Strange day or what? :-)

Good design!
[url=http://wgiitait.com/rjvd/ngeu.html]My homepage[/url] | [url=http://xkvwfblc.com/hfyu/veuh.html]Cool site[/url]

Great work!
My homepage | Please visit

Great work!
http://wgiitait.com/rjvd/ngeu.html | http://nylhhgoq.com/jaum/hmer.html

You have an outstanding good and well structured site. I enjoyed browsing through it » »

Very nice site! » » »

Post a Comment

The Idealist

  • Thrasymachus
  • Propagating In: Singapore
  • The Critic, The Philosopher, The Pragmatist, The Moralist, The Egalitarian, The Confused, The True-Blue Singaporean
My profile

Email Me At:

    thrasymachus.sg@gmail.com

Singapore Time

Poll Your Agony!

    NEW!
    Do you support the government's decision in barring certain Civil Society Organization members from the IMF/WB meetings?
    Fully support!
    Yes, but could have been more lenient
    Don't know...
    No, the govt is too rigid
    Absolute no!
    I don't give a damn about it...
    Current results


    Which topic do you wish to read at Singaporegovt?
    SM Goh Chok Tong: Behind the Scene
    Oppositions: Singapore Democratic Party
    Super Seven: Khaw Boon Wan, Dr Ng Eng Hen
    Super Seven II: Dr Vivian, Raymond Lim
    History V: Devan Nair
    History VI: Dr Goh Keng Swee
    Who is Thrasymachus (aka me)?
    All of the Above!
    None of the Above - I hate reading!
    Current results


    NEW!
    What do you think of the General Election 2006 (GE) Results?
    Accurately reflects the political preference of Singaporeans
    Somewhat accurate in reflecting Singapore's political preference
    PAP's win was too flattering
    Oppositions' percentage was too high
    Not accurate in reflecting the political preference of Singaporeans
    Totally inaccurate!
    Current results


    NEW!
    What do you think of the Gomez Issue?
    He is guilty of deceiving!
    He is not guilty!
    The whole issue was overblown by the PAP & media
    Don't care, Don't know!
    Current results


    NEW!
    What do you think of this site (singaporegovt.blogspot)?
    Good, Fair, Objective, Interesting Read
    Above Average
    Average
    Below Average
    Total Rubbish!
    Total mouthpiece of the PAP government!
    I HATE this site!
    I LOVE this site!
    Current results


    NEW!
    Which (Senior) Minister of State do you wish to see promoted to Full Minister?
    Ho Peng Kee
    Dr Balaji Sadasivan
    Zainul Abidin Rasheed
    Heng Chee How
    Lim Hwee Hua
    Grace Fu
    Radm Lui Teck Yew
    Lim Yi Shyan
    Gan Kim Yong
    Current results


    Which Election Candidate do you prefer?
    Low Thia Khiang (WP)
    Chiam See Tong (SDA)
    Sylvia Lim (WP)
    Chee Soon Juan (SDP)
    J.B. Jeyaratnam (Formerly WP)
    Lee Hsien Loong (PAP)
    Dr Ng Eng Hen (PAP)
    Sitoh Yih Pin (PAP)
    Eric Low (PAP)
    Current results


    How do you rate PM Lee Hsien Loong's Performance (as Prime Minister) so far?
    Excellent
    Very Good
    Above Expectation
    Average
    Poor ("I can even do better!")
    Very Poor
    Current results


    Do you have confidence in PM Lee Hsien Loong's leadership and his team of Ministers?
    Yes
    No
    Too early to tell...
    Any one but them!
    Current results


    Do you think Lee Hsien Loong became Prime Minister on his own merits?
    Yes!
    Yes! ("He was the best candidate")
    No! ("He has obvious backing from LKY")
    No! ("There wasn't any alternative candidate to challenge him in the first place")
    Current results


    Which of the (Junior) Minister to you wish to see him/her step down? (Part III)
    Raymond Lim
    Balaji Sadasivan
    Ho Peng Kee
    Chan Soo Sen
    Lim Hwee Hua
    Heng Chee How
    Gan Kim Yong
    Yu-Foo Yee Shoon
    Zainul Abidin
    Current results


    Which Minister do you wish to see him step down? (Part I)
    Lee Hsien Loong
    Goh Chok Tong
    Lee Kuan Yew
    Lim Boon Heng
    Lee Boon Yang
    Yeo Cheow Tong
    Mah Bow Tan
    George Yeo
    Teo Chee Hean
    Current results


    Which Minister do you wish to see him step down? (Part II)
    Lim Hng Kiang
    Wong Kan Seng
    S Jayakumar
    Tharman Shanmuguratnam
    Lim Swee Say
    Ng Eng Hen
    Vivian Balakrishnan
    Khaw Boon Wan
    Yaacob Ibrahim
    Current results


    What is your utmost concern for the coming General Elections?
    "Bread & Butter" issues - Jobs, economy, salary, etc
    Freedom of Speech - or lack of
    HDB issues - upgrading, high housing cost, etc
    International Issues - govt's handling of foreign relationships
    Transport issues - LTA, NEL, MRT
    Change of Leadership - from SM Goh to PM Lee
    All of the above
    I'll vote any party except PAP!
    I'll only vote for PAP!
    Current results


    Which is your favourite Minister?
    PM Lee Hsien Loong
    SM Goh Chok Tong
    MM Lee Kuan Yew
    DPM Jayakumar
    Dr Vivian Balakrishnan
    Teo Chee Hean
    George Yeo
    Tharman S.
    I Hate of them!
    Current results

Faces of Singapore

    www.flickr.com
    Thrasymachus' photos More of Thrasymachus' photos

Disclaimer

    The author of this blog bears no responsibility for any misinterpretation, libel, defamation, injury and death as a result of reading this blog. Contents are high subjective and readers should read with caution. All readers should be 18 years and above, with half a decent brain to judge the validity of the articles.

Search Blog


    Search WWW Search singaporegovt.blogspot.com

Number of Visitors

Powered by Blogger
and Blogger Templates